2 min read

CLOUD SERVERS vs SERVER COLOCATION – Which option is best for you.

Lately, there has been an explosion of interest in cloud servers; e.g., Azure and Amazon AWS. That’s because cloud servers are relatively easy to set up and manage and require no upfront investment. 

But are they the right move for small and midsize businesses and non-profits? Or is colocation a better option?

Each of the options has risks and benefits. We hope this brief article will provide information you will find helpful in assessing the best move for your organization.

Here are three issues to consider.

Control

With colocation, the customer controls both the hardware and the software.

Cloud servers provide customers with control over the software but not the hardware. This enables customers to shift both the responsibility and the work required for hardware.

It should be noted that, because cloud servers run in a shared environment, it is not clear what hardware a customer will have access to at any given time. Cloud server performance can vary, even across one provider’s platform. Amazon AWS, for example, is deliberately vague about the actual performance of their EC2 cloud servers, which gives them more leeway with the hardware configurations they use.

Security

The security of colocated servers is well understood. They are subject to natural and man-made disasters and redundancy is always a good practice.

Cloud servers, on the other hand, are relatively new. There is simply not enough information to determine the likelihood of security failures or their impact.

In addition to the same risks that colocation entails, the cloud server security risk falls into five categories[i].

  1. Shared access Will a flaw enable another customer or hacker to access your information?
  2. Virtual exploits include server host only, guest to guest, host to guest, and guest to host.
  3. Authentication, authorization, access control, and data protection What are the vulnerabilities of the provider’s choice of these key aspects?
  4. Availability and loss of data Cloud providers have had outages and data has been lost.
  5. Ownership Many cloud providers require that the data is the provider’s, not the customers. What uses might a provider make of your data?

Cost

Typical applications (e.g., QuickBooks) require a server with a redundant power supplies, 24/7 support, four core processors, 16 GB RAM, and two TB SATA storage.

The Dell lease price is about $50 per month. Colocation of a single server in Appia’s data center, including 30 Megs of bandwidth, is about $833 per year.

The following table shows the cost per year.

Amazon Cloud (m.4 large, Windows, reserved)

$1,611.96

   

Colocation

 

Server Lease

$600.00

Colocation Service

$719.00

Bandwidth

$114.00

Total

$1,433.00

   

Difference

-$178.68

Percent

11.08%

As the table shows, the costs are almost the same, with colocation having about an 11 percent advantage.

[i] See 5 Cloud Risks You Have to Stop Ignoring https://www.google.com/#q=the+5+cloud+risks+you+have+to+stop+ignoring

Seamless Symphony: Harmonizing UC Solutions with Current IT Ecosystems

Introduction

In today's fast-paced digital landscape, effective communication stands as the backbone of successful enterprises. Unified...

Read More

Breaking Down the 2024 Frost Radar: Cloud-Connected Calling Enablement

Introduction

Frost & Sullivan has released its much-anticipated 2024 Frost Radar™ report on cloud-connected calling enablement, which delves into the...

Read More

UCaaS: Navigating Between Global, Regional, and a Hybrid Blend

Introduction

In the ever-evolving world of business communications, making the right choice in Unified Communications as a Service (UCaaS) is more...

Read More